Skip to content
Elite Guide Direct

Might Other Countries Pursue Australia's in Banning Social Media for Teenagers Under 16?

Australia's decisive action to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a rising chorus of states are moving toward similar measures.

  • The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that phones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law may be formalized in the coming year.
  • The Norwegian government is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "influence of the AI".
  • The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the tools on the table".
  • In Spain, the president has urged parliament to approve a law increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
  • In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
  • The administration in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is granted. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the move does not establish binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a useful foundation," commented the European lawmaker behind the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by robust evidence".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the government committed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. One foundation founded by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful online content argues that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," said a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the state level amid national inaction.

  • The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
  • The state of Florida has enacted a measure barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
  • The state of Virginia has approved a regulation limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra access requiring a guardian's okay.
  • The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various figures to mimic this lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of the West, further nations are likewise considering moves.

  • The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
  • The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global agencies adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

While this international conversation continues, the policies of Australia and others show that policymakers around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.

About the author

Elizabeth Jones

Sophie is a travel enthusiast and lifestyle writer with a passion for uncovering unique destinations and sharing insider tips.

Elite Guide Direct

Type to search articles.